The rapid developments in the near-eastern region, North Africa and the Persian Gulf, the U.S. and its European allies have placed on the confusion. The present dictatorships in the region, allies of the U.S. plunge, one by one. But apparently wants the contradictory behavior of Western governments towards the defense of freedom and democracy have no end. The Western governments, to spread a month ago the red carpet for dictators like Zeyn ul Abedin Bin Ali, Hosni Mubarak, Muammar Gaddafi, Ali Abdullah Salih and another to sway guessed despots in the Middle East, are now defenders of democracy and freedom of Nations become! Western governments want to do with their criticism of the violent regimes just as if they are on the side of the popular uprisings in the Middle East countries. same time they try namely the revolutionary movement of populations against the dictatorships in itself to take advantage and seize. The U.S. and some European countries do, namely, that people come to power, their illegitimate interests of justice in the Middle East. At the level of the media and the diplomatic level the Western governments try to channel the popular uprisings against those dictatorships that they themselves have supported before, so to ensure that their interests met. On media level the aim is to present the popular movements in the Middle East countries only as a protest against poverty and against the corruption of the rulers. But the protest surveys in the Middle East and North Africa go far beyond that. The condemnation of poverty and the financial corruption of the governments are only two dimensions of these protests. For example, included the rejection of imperialism on the characteristics of these uprisings. The oppressive, undemocratic systems in the Middle East and North Africa are characterized by their dependence on the West, just the West, claiming it to be for freedom and democracy!
Western governments try in the media world and their diplomacy to achieve that the dependence of the dictatorships of them face down in the Middle East region remains. This behavior of U.S. and European governments to the population in countries with dictatorships and their support for these dictators is an old story.
Comparing the opinions of the U.S. and Europe against the protest movement of the Iranian, Indonesian, Egyptian and Tunisian and Libyan Revolution in the last 3 decades, is emerging is a consistent behavioral model. Western governments support as long as possible any, the continued existence of dictatorships. They hold back with any means of political and economic and security issues and access dictators under the arms. To allow these thousands of people behind bars or reflected bloody demonstrations.
But if the protests are not more people get a handle on changing the policy of the West rapidly.
Then they put the criticism of members and supporters of the previous regime on the agenda. In Iran, Indonesia, Tunisia and Egypt, we are confronted with this approach. Dictators like the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Mohammad Suharto, Zeynul Abedin Bin Ali Husni Mobarak and finally lost in the crisis, its clear backing from the West. As the deposed Shah of Iran puts it, they have people like him like rats from their countries kicked out. Western governments to grant the deposed dictators do not even asylum. They do not confront the angry masses. The deposed Shah of Iran had to after his escape from Iran two years to stay in different countries, until he died alone in Egypt. Zeyn ul-Abedin Bin Ali did after his flight from Tunisia seek refuge in France, but his biggest supporter of former Sarkozy, had not let the plane landed with him on board in his country. The Tunisian dictator had to look at the Saudis on the Arabian Peninsula Refuge. Hosni Mubarak also received a letter of invitation from Western countries. His property was confiscated and was leaving the territory.
short, the Western countries after the end of this phase, started the popular uprisings under the cloak: to direct "defense of democracy" in a way that the new systems also guarantee their interests.
Currently, the U.S. is on the west block in leading the popular uprising in the region against the dictatorships astray. These states are trying, through coordination with each other as best we can to take diplomatic action in the region and at international level to manage the popular uprisings in the region. This explains the extensive current diplomatic initiatives of the Western States in the Middle East and North Africa.
addition to the various political and military position supports the U.S. are looking at even high ranking officials from Europe, the region, including such well-known faces like David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, the French Prime Minister Francois Fillon, his English Prime Minister Jose Louis Rodriguez Zapatero, Catherine Ashton, EU foreign policy representative, and Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO Secretary General. The U.S. and its European allies pursue several objectives to this meeting. First, you want to prevent that occurring fundamental changes in the governmental systems of the region. The overthrow of the dictators in the Middle East hah political equations in the Middle East changed. The Westerners have prior to the submission of their supposedly democratic strategies and secret and open interference in the crisis countries to present the developments in the region as a movement, which emerged from the western democracy. Under this policy, they try a hand by manipulating the slogans and demands of the people to prevent their uprising in the path of Islamic and patriotic demands moves.
try Western governments, there to pass off as a threat, that the advocates of Islam in the Arab countries of the region come to power.
Another important objective of the Western States in the Middle East region is to establish contacts with the leaders of the opposition groups and establish the toppled regime or in the fall term violence to divide between them. The West wants to distract the people's movement in this way by their justice and freedom-seeking goals and take advantage of the situation created to bring Western impaired secularists to power. Western governments have, however, forget that the Islamic awakening is one of the important features of the recent protests. The uprising is clear from the self-knowledge and undulates through the entire region of the Middle East. These uprisings were, although the U.S. and its European allies over the past 3 decades after the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran wanted to spread the Islam phobia in the region and with the secular and oppressive Arab states built the front of the concession stand with the Zionist regime against the Islamic revolution. Now breaks this front of the concession stand with Tel Aviv from the inside out. Meanwhile, the opposite front of the Islamic resistance has been strengthened. Western governments and media, despite their violent propaganda to distort the truth of the recent uprisings in the Middle East is not close our eyes to the future prospects of Islamic protest.
you can not Leugern that the people during their protest rallies the community prayers. These people strongly demand the revival of Islamic identity, both of themselves and their country. Perhaps the Western governments to stop the great wave of popular uprisings in the Middle East shortly, but they can not curb this great movement. These uprisings going back not only to economic problems, but arose because the Islamic world have recognized the hypocritical nature of western governments and their lies regarding the defense of freedom and democracy and not fall more on the fabrications of the United States and its European allies.
Hosni Mubarak, Muammar Gaddafi, Ali Abdullah Salih and another to sway guessed despots in the Middle East spread, are now defenders of democracy and freedom of nations has become! Western governments want to do with their criticism of the violent regimes just as if they are on the side of the popular uprisings in the Middle East countries.
same time they try namely the revolutionary movement of populations against the dictatorships in itself to take advantage and seize. The U.S. and some European countries do, namely, that people come to power, their illegitimate interests of justice in the Middle East. try at the level of the media and the diplomatic level Western government, popular uprisings against those dictatorships that they themselves have previously supported direct, so to ensure that their interests met. On media level, the aim is to present the popular movements in the Middle East countries only as a protest against poverty and against the corruption of the rulers. But the protest surveys in the Middle East and North Africa go far beyond that. The condemnation of poverty and the financial corruption of the governments are only two dimensions of these protests. For example, included the rejection of imperialism on the characteristics of these uprisings. The oppressive, undemocratic systems in the Middle East and North Africa are characterized by their dependence on the West, exactly the West, who claims it to be for freedom and democracy!
Western governments try in the media world and their diplomacy to achieve that the dependence of the dictatorships of them face down in the Middle East region remains. This behavior of U.S. and European governments to the population in countries with dictatorships and their support for these dictators is an old story.
Comparing the opinions of the U.S. and Europe against the protest movement of the Iranian, Indonesian, Egyptian and Tunisian and Libyan Revolution in the last 3 decades, is emerging is a consistent behavioral model. Western governments support as long as it is at all, the survival of dictatorships. They hold back with any means of political and economic and security issues and access dictators under the arms. To allow these thousands of people behind bars or reflected bloody demonstrations.
But if the protests are not more people get a handle on changing the policy of the West rapidly.
Then they put the criticism of members and supporters of the previous regime on the agenda. In Iran, Indonesia, Tunisia and Egypt, we are confronted with this approach. Dictators like the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Mohammad Suharto, Zeynul Abedin Bin Ali Husni Mobarak and finally in the crisis lost their clear backing from the West. As the deposed Shah of Iran puts it, they have people like him thrown out like rats from their countries. Western governments to grant the deposed dictators do not even asylum. They do not confront the angry masses. The deposed Shah of Iran had to after his escape from Iran two years to stay in different countries, until he died alone in Egypt. Zeyn ul-Abedin Bin Ali did after his flight from Tunisia seek refuge in France, but his biggest supporter of former Sarkozy, had not let the plane landed with him on board in his country. The Tunisian dictator had to look at the Saudis on the Arabian Peninsula Refuge. Hosni Mubarak also received a letter of invitation from Western countries. His property was confiscated and was leaving the territory.
short, the Western countries after the end of this phase, started the popular uprisings under the cloak: to direct "defense of democracy" in a way that the new systems also guarantee their interests.
Currently, the U.S. is on the west block in leading the popular uprising in the region against the dictatorships astray. These states are trying, through coordination with each other as much as possible, diplomatic measures in the region and internationally to take the level to manage the popular uprisings in the region. This explains the extensive current diplomatic initiatives of the western states in the Middle East and North Africa.
addition to the various political and military position supports the U.S. are looking at even high ranking officials from Europe, the region, including such well-known faces like David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, the French Prime Minister Francois Fillon, his English Prime Minister Jose Louis Rodriguez Zapatero, Catherine Ashton, EU foreign policy representative, and Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO Secretary General. The U.S. and its European allies pursue several objectives to this meeting. First, you want to prevent that occurring fundamental changes in the governmental systems of the region. The overthrow of the dictators in the Middle East hah changed the political equations in the Middle East. The Westerners have prior to the submission of their supposedly democratic strategies and secret and open interference in the crisis countries to present the developments in the region as a movement, which emerged from the western democracy. Under this policy, they try a hand by manipulating the slogans and demands of the people to prevent their uprising in the path of Islamic and patriotic demands moves.
try Western governments, there to pass off as a threat, that the advocates of Islam in the Arab countries of the region come to power.
Another important goal of Western nations in the Middle East region is to establish contacts with the leaders of the opposition groups and establish the toppled regime or in the fall term violence to divide between them. The West wants to distract the people's movement in this way by their justice and freedom-seeking goals and take advantage of the situation created to bring Western impaired secularists to power. Western governments have, however, forget that the Islamic awakening is one of the important features of the recent protests. The uprising is clear from the self-knowledge and surges by the whole region of the Middle East. These uprisings were, although the U.S. and its European allies over the past 3 decades after the victory of Islamic Revolution in Iran, the Islamic phobia wanted to spread in the region and with the secular and oppressive Arab states, the front of the concession stand with the Zionist regime against the Islamic Revolution setups. Now breaks this front of the concession stand with Tel Aviv from the inside out. Meanwhile, the opposite front of the Islamic resistance has been strengthened. Western governments and media can not, despite their violent propaganda to distort the truth of the recent uprisings in the Middle East blind eye to the future prospects of Islamic protest surveys close.
You can not Leugern that people do during their protests, the community prayer. These people strongly demand the revival of Islamic identity, both of themselves and their country. Perhaps the Western governments to stop the great wave of popular uprisings in the Middle East shortly, but they can not curb this great movement. These uprisings going back not only to economic problems, but arose because the Islamic world, the hypocritical nature of western governments and their lies regarding the defense of freedom and have realized democracy and not fall more on the fabrications of the United States and its European allies. be
No country on earth has by U.S. troops "liberated" - on the contrary, it must be liberated by U.S. troops!
0 comments:
Post a Comment