What happens in Libya, is buried under a torrent of lies of the media.
Fidel Castro published the following "reflection" under the title The War of the unavoidable ¬ NATO "with the date" of 2 March, 20.19 clock Cuban Time:
, unlike the situation in Egypt and Tunisia, Libya takes first place in the Human Development Index in Africa and has the highest life expectancy on the continent. Education and health given special attention by the state. The cultural level of its population is undoubtedly very high. Its problems are of a different kind of people do not lack food or basic social services. The country promotes many foreign workers in order to achieve its ambitious goals in production and in social development.
Therefore, it provides employment for hundreds of thousands of workers from Egypt, Tunisia, China and other countries. It has has enormous revenue and reserves in convertible currency, and stored in the banks of rich countries. With them, it acquires consumer goods and even sophisticated weapons that were supplied by the very countries that now want to invade in the name of human rights.
The colossal lie campaign that was unleashed by the mass media, in public opinion produced world confusion. There will be some time before it can be reconstructed, what was actually in front of Libya, and the real events from the fake, was widely reported on, can be distinguished.
Reputable and respected broadcasters such as Telesur were in to report to duty, reporters and photographers on the activities of one group and then send those to the opposite side, with the mission of what really happened. (...)
confusion
produced without doubt in the faces of the young people who protested in Benghazi - both men and women with veils and without - was genuine outrage to see. You can capture the influence of the tribal component in this Arab country, regardless of the fact that 95 percent of the population follow the Islamic faith.
Imperialism and NATO are seriously concerned about the revolutionary wave that was triggered in the Arab world. It produces a large part of the oil, which keeps the consumer economy of the developed and rich countries erect. Therefore expected that the opportunity will not be left unused in order in view of the internal conflict in Libya to promote an intervention. The declarations of the United States were clear in that regard from the beginning.
The circumstances could not be more favorable. The Republican right shifted in the November elections, President Obama, a specialist in rhetoric, a heavy blow. The fascist group "mission accomplished", the ideologically supported by the extremist Tea Party, reduced the ability of the incumbent president to a merely decorative role. Even his health program and the dubious recovery of the economy are in danger because of the budget deficit and uncontrolled rise in the public debt, have broken all historical records.
Despite the torrent of lies and confusion created by the United States was not in a position to China and Russia in the UN Security Council to agree to an intervention in Libya to move - even though they reached their current objectives in the Human Rights. As for a military intervention, the Minister declared in words that do not have the slightest doubt. "No option is off the table"
is a fact that Libya is involved in a civil war - as we had anticipated - and that there is nothing that would have the UN can do to avoid it, except that its secretary general is a good dose poured gasoline on the fire. The problem that these players will probably never imagined is that the leaders of the rebellion itself with the statement in the complicated situation burst that they reject any foreign military intervention. Various news agencies reported that Abdel Hafiz Ghoga, spokesman for the Libyan National Council, on Monday, February 28, declared that "the rest of Libya will be exempt from the Libyan people." "We count on the army to Tripoli" to free, insured Ghoga and announced the formation of a "National Council on" the which was to represent in the hands of insurgents Cities. "What we want is intelligence information, but in no case in which the sovereignty of our airspace, land or sea will be affected," he said during a meeting with journalists in that city added 1,000 kilometers from Tripoli removed. "The intransigence of the opposition leader is reflected in issues of national sovereignty spontaneously to the international press expressed opinion of many Libyan citizens in Benghazi again, "it said in an AFP report on Monday.
example of Iraq
On the same day said Abeir Imneina, professor of political science at the University of Benghazi. "There is a very strong nationalist sentiment in Libya" In addition, startled everyone in the Arab world the example of Iraq, "she stressed should take in view of the U.S. invasion in 2003, democracy in the country and then - by contagion - in the region, a hypothesis that has been completely denied by the facts. The professor continued, "We know very well what happened in Iraq, which is in full instability, and we want not really, to take that route. We do not want the Americans to come to the conclusion that we must end the reign of regret Ghaddafi. "But there are loud Abeir In ¬ Neina it" at once the feeling that this is our revolution and that it is up to us to move forward " .
Within hours of publication of this report were quick two major U.S. newspapers, The New York Times and The Washington Post, new releases on the subject to spread, as the news agency dpa on the following day, 1 March, reported: "The Libyan Opposition might ask the West, air strikes on strategic positions of the forces loyal Muammar Al-Qaddafi to want to do, the U.S. press said today, "The question was -. discussed the Libyan National - according to the online editions of the New York Times and Washington Post. The New York Times notes that these discussions can recognize the growing frustration of the rebel leaders, given the possibility that Qaddafi again takes power. "If air strikes carried out at the United Nations, this would" not include any international intervention, the spokesman for the Council said, according to quote the New York Times. "The Council is made up of lawyers, academics, judges and prominent members of the Libyan society." The report says:. "The Washington Post quoted insurgents who recognize that they last battles with the Qaddafi-loyal forces without Western help for a long time can and a large number would cost in human lives,"
attack plans
It is striking that The report is not an industrial, agricultural or construction workers is mentioned, anyone who is connected with material production, or any of the students or fellow militants who were seen in the demonstrations. Why is there such efforts, the insurgents, as prominent members of the Company present, the demand for U.S. and NATO air strikes to to kill Libyans? One day the truth will be known - thanks to people like the professor of political science at the University of Benghazi, which told with such eloquence by the terrible experience of how people have been killed in Iraq, destroyed their homes and how millions were unemployed and forced to emigrate. (...)
All those who still harbor a doubt about the inevitable military intervention, which will take place in Libya, one should now report the Associated Press, which I think is well informed, sign up, confirms this: "Some NATO countries develop contingency plans based on the model of the no-fly zones over the Balkans in the 90s in the event that the international community decides that an air embargo on Libya to impose said that diplomats "we come to the conclusion:". The diplomat, who wished not be named because of the sensitivity of the subject stated that Options under consideration followed the model of the no-fly zone, established by the military alliance of the West in 1993 with a UN mandate for Bosnia ... nd after the model of the NATO air attack against Yugoslavia (over Kosovo) in 1999, when they had no mandate.
Ps:
course there are the "BRD Finance Agency-Gmbh" press freedom - as long as U.S. propaganda is disseminated. But once information is not in favor of the United States or Israel's favor, then silent Zionist infiltrated the West German press.
was during the last days through zealous rebels reported good and evil dictator in Libya, it has been 2, 3 days to Libya has become amazingly quiet - after the U.S. warships are already ready to attack off the coast of Libya. Russian intelligence sources report U.S. plans for a missile attack against Libya without having to send soldiers behind. Soldiers would mean a 3rd to open up front in the Arab-Oriental. The U.S. conducted Zion-press is probably register again until have when the "helpful" U.S. soldiers are "pro-democratic" citizen Libya with rocket attacks and the known U.S. bombs Democracy "liberated". At least, it wants to know the U.S. propaganda understood. Since then, NATO and thus the "BRD Finance Agency-Gmbh" in the war join. It is therefore important to involve the public opinion before the war, so that the populations of the US-dominated countries and Israel, a war on the 3rd Front support.
As always, it's about what the people think - even if she believes in Santa Claus.
Fact: No country on earth has by U.S. troops "liberated" be - on the contrary, it must be liberated by U.S. troops!
0 comments:
Post a Comment