A Lot Of Cervical Mucus Could Be Pregnant

An elaborate plot

Round of collective bargaining in the public sector: trade unions and Re-YAW-ung are unanimous when it comes to plundering and dumbing down of the German people.

Several thousand workers of the countries participated in last week warning strike to protest for higher wages and salaries. The unions called the strike of public service, who meet from Wednesday to Friday this week in Potsdam with the representatives of the countries to the third round of collective bargaining.

the competent trade union Verdi (public service), GEW (teacher), DGP (police) and DBB (officials), the strikes were designed to blow off steam and prepare for an imminent sale. Although affected by the agreement, approximately 600,000 employees in the country, they made sure that the short strikes were few and isolated. On Monday, each were about 2,500 employees in the public service in Hesse and Saarland in the strike. On Tuesday, then North Rhine-Westphalia and Schleswig-Holstein have been on strike department. On Wednesday, Bavaria and Rhineland-Palatinate was our turn.

The employees include workers of the country as well as road maintenance workers in hospitals, theaters, offices and especially in schools and colleges. Are the largest group employed some 200,000 teachers. Add about 120,000 workers are in higher education. The next agreement will then serve as the basis for the country's officials.

The demand of the unions is extremely modest, given that real wages in the public service for over ten years continuously decreased and remained even after the stagnating incomes in the private sector. They demand a salary increase of three percent plus 50 € a month for a maturity of 14 months. They also call for the adoption of the trainees and a contract for grading teachers.

For the two million employees of the federal and local authorities had Verdi a year ago agreed to a phased tariff increase of 2.6 percent with a maturity of 26 months. At that time the union had been calling for an increase of 5 percent, and also organized strikes. But then they signed a deal which was left behind not only far behind the inflation rate, but also a wedge between the workers of the countries and those operating federal and local authorities. For the latter prevails until mid-2012 peace obligation, so that there can be no common fare fight.

This year's contract talks is a stitch as last year's game between the ruling parties and trade unions.

The representatives of the countries in the first two rounds of negotiations, the demands of the unions flatly refused and refused to submit a separate tender. You want to negotiate until the unions have scaled down their demand. They occur as stubborn and self-consciously, because they know they can count on the support of the unions.

They had agreed with the unions from the outset three negotiating dates. The third round of negotiations this week was therefore not materialize because the negotiations bogged down, were like the Verdi leader Frank Bsirske claimed word radical. It was planned from the outset. The press release from Verdi does not speak of a deadlock, instead is a "substantive negotiating atmosphere," the speech. Lower Saxony's Finance Minister Hartmut Möllring (CDU), chief negotiator for the provincial governments, called it a "constructive atmosphere".

on both sides of the negotiating table, sitting members of the same parties and advise how the attacks can succeed against the best employees. Thus, the chief negotiator for the union, Verdi boss Bsirske, a member of the Greens. He sits across from his party colleague, Carol Linnemann, which represents as a senator with Bremer Financial Möllring the employers. Other Verdi functionaries are members of the SPD and the Left Party.

since 1998 have plundered red-green, black-red-yellow and black Federal governments the countries finances and the state governments, in which the Left party is represented, have passed the impact on the population. So take about Hessen and Berlin not participate in the current collective bargaining because they are withdrawn from the employers' association in order to push the wages by collective bargaining. The red-red Berlin Senate in 2003 was leading this development. The Berlin state close to 50,000 employees earn an average of 6 percent less than other states.

With the financial and economic crisis of 2008 increased federal and state governments, their savings efforts, to the billion cost of bank bailouts recoup. 2009, the grand coalition anchored then a debt brake in the Basic Law, which requires all countries to balance its budget.

The cuts, which come to those employed in the civil service, the former by far. The green Bremer Financial Linnert senator has therefore already threatened to withdraw from the collective bargaining unit, if the statements should be too high.

cuts in teachers

The demands of the teachers employed, that number is growing steadily, playing in this year's wage negotiations, a special role. They require a controlled grouping to get the same job the same wage as career civil servant teachers.

were used to all teachers and civil servants were paid according to salary laws of the countries. In recent years, however, many countries - particularly in the east - gone over to the teachers to be no longer civil servants but only to employ as an employee, so as to reduce the pension payments for civil servants. As the largest items are personnel costs in the budgets of the countries and constitute the largest group of teachers here, try the state governments, above all, to enforce savings.

As for the teachers not employed Grading contract exists, its content rather arbitrarily defined on the basis of the collective agreement of the civil service of the countries (TVöD-L), resulting in lower wages than they receive career civil servant teachers. As 1961 came

federal civil service pay scale (BAT) in force, an appointed teacher or a lecturer at universities have earned about 7 percent more than an equivalent official. It was considered that the employee was required to pay pension contributions. The net pay was about the same. This changed radically in the 1990s. Mainly because of legislative measures, the net income of officials and employees developed to the detriment the latter apart.

addition, the teachers pay staff not on official rates, but based on the Civil Service Law. For the classification of the activity is not decisive, but the "career-legal condition", ie the training. Thousands of teachers are paid less because they do not have the required training for the type of school where they teach.

The countries set for years not enough young teachers. According to the OECD report "Education at a Glance" has 100 outgoing compared to only 60 trained young teachers. inform the basis of this general teacher shortage, many teachers in schools, for which they were not trained - primary school teacher in middle school, secondary school teachers at vocational schools or high schools, etc.

particularly frequently affected, according to the GEW teachers of wage discrimination that have received their training under GDR law or in the reverse time . The country's finance minister make such a teacher is happy because they are "cheaper" are. The same is true for so-called "career changers", academician of other professional sectors, which are recruited for teaching.

intensified the 2005/2006, agreed by governments and trade unions, collective bargaining for public employees (TVöD) the gap between employees and officials again. New hires were paid because of a lack of mandatory grading contract for the pay grades 11 and 13 of the TVöD-L. According GEW teachers' incomes decreased by 25 to 27 percent. The staff salaries are now, according to calculations by the PRO at the beginning of the occupation, monthly up to 650 euros, below the comparable gross official, and even after five years of activity they are still up to 370 € lower.

Because of this continuing for years cut the salaries of discontent among teachers is particularly high. That is the reason why trade unions and state governments represent their elaborate plot by the public as hard labor dispute. They want prevent a broad social movement developed against falling incomes, which could easily exceed the limits of public service. In the end, the unions will close again compromising, sacrificing the income and working conditions of employees of the savings plans of the governments at federal, state and local governments.

How To Redo My Interior

inevitable war

What happens in Libya, is buried under a torrent of lies of the media.

Fidel Castro published the following "reflection" under the title The War of the unavoidable ¬ NATO "with the date" of 2 March, 20.19 clock Cuban Time:

, unlike the situation in Egypt and Tunisia, Libya takes first place in the Human Development Index in Africa and has the highest life expectancy on the continent. Education and health given special attention by the state. The cultural level of its population is undoubtedly very high. Its problems are of a different kind of people do not lack food or basic social services. The country promotes many foreign workers in order to achieve its ambitious goals in production and in social development.

Therefore, it provides employment for hundreds of thousands of workers from Egypt, Tunisia, China and other countries. It has has enormous revenue and reserves in convertible currency, and stored in the banks of rich countries. With them, it acquires consumer goods and even sophisticated weapons that were supplied by the very countries that now want to invade in the name of human rights.

The colossal lie campaign that was unleashed by the mass media, in public opinion produced world confusion. There will be some time before it can be reconstructed, what was actually in front of Libya, and the real events from the fake, was widely reported on, can be distinguished.

Reputable and respected broadcasters such as Telesur were in to report to duty, reporters and photographers on the activities of one group and then send those to the opposite side, with the mission of what really happened. (...)

confusion

produced without doubt in the faces of the young people who protested in Benghazi - both men and women with veils and without - was genuine outrage to see. You can capture the influence of the tribal component in this Arab country, regardless of the fact that 95 percent of the population follow the Islamic faith.

Imperialism and NATO are seriously concerned about the revolutionary wave that was triggered in the Arab world. It produces a large part of the oil, which keeps the consumer economy of the developed and rich countries erect. Therefore expected that the opportunity will not be left unused in order in view of the internal conflict in Libya to promote an intervention. The declarations of the United States were clear in that regard from the beginning.

The circumstances could not be more favorable. The Republican right shifted in the November elections, President Obama, a specialist in rhetoric, a heavy blow. The fascist group "mission accomplished", the ideologically supported by the extremist Tea Party, reduced the ability of the incumbent president to a merely decorative role. Even his health program and the dubious recovery of the economy are in danger because of the budget deficit and uncontrolled rise in the public debt, have broken all historical records.

Despite the torrent of lies and confusion created by the United States was not in a position to China and Russia in the UN Security Council to agree to an intervention in Libya to move - even though they reached their current objectives in the Human Rights. As for a military intervention, the Minister declared in words that do not have the slightest doubt. "No option is off the table"

is a fact that Libya is involved in a civil war - as we had anticipated - and that there is nothing that would have the UN can do to avoid it, except that its secretary general is a good dose poured gasoline on the fire. The problem that these players will probably never imagined is that the leaders of the rebellion itself with the statement in the complicated situation burst that they reject any foreign military intervention. Various news agencies reported that Abdel Hafiz Ghoga, spokesman for the Libyan National Council, on Monday, February 28, declared that "the rest of Libya will be exempt from the Libyan people." "We count on the army to Tripoli" to free, insured Ghoga and announced the formation of a "National Council on" the which was to represent in the hands of insurgents Cities. "What we want is intelligence information, but in no case in which the sovereignty of our airspace, land or sea will be affected," he said during a meeting with journalists in that city added 1,000 kilometers from Tripoli removed. "The intransigence of the opposition leader is reflected in issues of national sovereignty spontaneously to the international press expressed opinion of many Libyan citizens in Benghazi again, "it said in an AFP report on Monday.

example of Iraq

On the same day said Abeir Imneina, professor of political science at the University of Benghazi. "There is a very strong nationalist sentiment in Libya" In addition, startled everyone in the Arab world the example of Iraq, "she stressed should take in view of the U.S. invasion in 2003, democracy in the country and then - by contagion - in the region, a hypothesis that has been completely denied by the facts. The professor continued, "We know very well what happened in Iraq, which is in full instability, and we want not really, to take that route. We do not want the Americans to come to the conclusion that we must end the reign of regret Ghaddafi. "But there are loud Abeir In ¬ Neina it" at once the feeling that this is our revolution and that it is up to us to move forward " .

Within hours of publication of this report were quick two major U.S. newspapers, The New York Times and The Washington Post, new releases on the subject to spread, as the news agency dpa on the following day, 1 March, reported: "The Libyan Opposition might ask the West, air strikes on strategic positions of the forces loyal Muammar Al-Qaddafi to want to do, the U.S. press said today, "The question was -. discussed the Libyan National - according to the online editions of the New York Times and Washington Post. The New York Times notes that these discussions can recognize the growing frustration of the rebel leaders, given the possibility that Qaddafi again takes power. "If air strikes carried out at the United Nations, this would" not include any international intervention, the spokesman for the Council said, according to quote the New York Times. "The Council is made up of lawyers, academics, judges and prominent members of the Libyan society." The report says:. "The Washington Post quoted insurgents who recognize that they last battles with the Qaddafi-loyal forces without Western help for a long time can and a large number would cost in human lives,"

attack plans

It is striking that The report is not an industrial, agricultural or construction workers is mentioned, anyone who is connected with material production, or any of the students or fellow militants who were seen in the demonstrations. Why is there such efforts, the insurgents, as prominent members of the Company present, the demand for U.S. and NATO air strikes to to kill Libyans? One day the truth will be known - thanks to people like the professor of political science at the University of Benghazi, which told with such eloquence by the terrible experience of how people have been killed in Iraq, destroyed their homes and how millions were unemployed and forced to emigrate. (...)

All those who still harbor a doubt about the inevitable military intervention, which will take place in Libya, one should now report the Associated Press, which I think is well informed, sign up, confirms this: "Some NATO countries develop contingency plans based on the model of the no-fly zones over the Balkans in the 90s in the event that the international community decides that an air embargo on Libya to impose said that diplomats "we come to the conclusion:". The diplomat, who wished not be named because of the sensitivity of the subject stated that Options under consideration followed the model of the no-fly zone, established by the military alliance of the West in 1993 with a UN mandate for Bosnia ... nd after the model of the NATO air attack against Yugoslavia (over Kosovo) in 1999, when they had no mandate.

Ps:
course there are the "BRD Finance Agency-Gmbh" press freedom - as long as U.S. propaganda is disseminated. But once information is not in favor of the United States or Israel's favor, then silent Zionist infiltrated the West German press.
was during the last days through zealous rebels reported good and evil dictator in Libya, it has been 2, 3 days to Libya has become amazingly quiet - after the U.S. warships are already ready to attack off the coast of Libya. Russian intelligence sources report U.S. plans for a missile attack against Libya without having to send soldiers behind. Soldiers would mean a 3rd to open up front in the Arab-Oriental. The U.S. conducted Zion-press is probably register again until have when the "helpful" U.S. soldiers are "pro-democratic" citizen Libya with rocket attacks and the known U.S. bombs Democracy "liberated". At least, it wants to know the U.S. propaganda understood. Since then, NATO and thus the "BRD Finance Agency-Gmbh" in the war join. It is therefore important to involve the public opinion before the war, so that the populations of the US-dominated countries and Israel, a war on the 3rd Front support.
As always, it's about what the people think - even if she believes in Santa Claus.

Fact: No country on earth has by U.S. troops "liberated" be - on the contrary, it must be liberated by U.S. troops!

Prices Of The Haircuts In Jcpeney In Ga

USrael is the cause of violence in Afghanistan

said Foreign Ministry spokesman Mehmanparast: The military presence of the West under U.S. leadership in Afghanistan, the violence brought back into the country and increases the production and transit of drugs many times. Mehmanparast denied the claim of the U.S. NATO commander in Afghanistan. He had claimed that Iran arming the rebels with weapons. Mehmanparast said: Apart from the massacre of innocent women and children through the United States, which alone in the last week claimed 70 civilian victims, children and women, are the observers agree that the US-led military presence in Afghanistan had two consequences: first, violence and radical forces returned to the political arena, and secondly, the production and smuggling of drugs shot high into the air.
Mehmanparast called Iran the vanguard in the fight against terrorism and drug smuggling, and said Iran closely monitored the movements and contacts of the U.S. forces to terrorist groups in Afghanistan. According
Mehmanparast is handled the bulk of drug smuggling through the airports of Kandahar and Bagram, which are under U.S. control.
Fact: No country on earth must be "liberated" by U.S. troops - on the contrary, it must be liberated by U.S. troops!

What Is A Good Name For An Umbreon

Western Gängeleiversuche in the Middle East

The rapid developments in the near-eastern region, North Africa and the Persian Gulf, the U.S. and its European allies have placed on the confusion. The present dictatorships in the region, allies of the U.S. plunge, one by one. But apparently wants the contradictory behavior of Western governments towards the defense of freedom and democracy have no end. The Western governments, to spread a month ago the red carpet for dictators like Zeyn ul Abedin Bin Ali, Hosni Mubarak, Muammar Gaddafi, Ali Abdullah Salih and another to sway guessed despots in the Middle East, are now defenders of democracy and freedom of Nations become! Western governments want to do with their criticism of the violent regimes just as if they are on the side of the popular uprisings in the Middle East countries.

same time they try namely the revolutionary movement of populations against the dictatorships in itself to take advantage and seize. The U.S. and some European countries do, namely, that people come to power, their illegitimate interests of justice in the Middle East. At the level of the media and the diplomatic level the Western governments try to channel the popular uprisings against those dictatorships that they themselves have supported before, so to ensure that their interests met. On media level the aim is to present the popular movements in the Middle East countries only as a protest against poverty and against the corruption of the rulers. But the protest surveys in the Middle East and North Africa go far beyond that. The condemnation of poverty and the financial corruption of the governments are only two dimensions of these protests. For example, included the rejection of imperialism on the characteristics of these uprisings. The oppressive, undemocratic systems in the Middle East and North Africa are characterized by their dependence on the West, just the West, claiming it to be for freedom and democracy!

Western governments try in the media world and their diplomacy to achieve that the dependence of the dictatorships of them face down in the Middle East region remains. This behavior of U.S. and European governments to the population in countries with dictatorships and their support for these dictators is an old story.

Comparing the opinions of the U.S. and Europe against the protest movement of the Iranian, Indonesian, Egyptian and Tunisian and Libyan Revolution in the last 3 decades, is emerging is a consistent behavioral model. Western governments support as long as possible any, the continued existence of dictatorships. They hold back with any means of political and economic and security issues and access dictators under the arms. To allow these thousands of people behind bars or reflected bloody demonstrations.

But if the protests are not more people get a handle on changing the policy of the West rapidly.

Then they put the criticism of members and supporters of the previous regime on the agenda. In Iran, Indonesia, Tunisia and Egypt, we are confronted with this approach. Dictators like the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Mohammad Suharto, Zeynul Abedin Bin Ali Husni Mobarak and finally lost in the crisis, its clear backing from the West. As the deposed Shah of Iran puts it, they have people like him like rats from their countries kicked out. Western governments to grant the deposed dictators do not even asylum. They do not confront the angry masses. The deposed Shah of Iran had to after his escape from Iran two years to stay in different countries, until he died alone in Egypt. Zeyn ul-Abedin Bin Ali did after his flight from Tunisia seek refuge in France, but his biggest supporter of former Sarkozy, had not let the plane landed with him on board in his country. The Tunisian dictator had to look at the Saudis on the Arabian Peninsula Refuge. Hosni Mubarak also received a letter of invitation from Western countries. His property was confiscated and was leaving the territory.

short, the Western countries after the end of this phase, started the popular uprisings under the cloak: to direct "defense of democracy" in a way that the new systems also guarantee their interests.

Currently, the U.S. is on the west block in leading the popular uprising in the region against the dictatorships astray. These states are trying, through coordination with each other as best we can to take diplomatic action in the region and at international level to manage the popular uprisings in the region. This explains the extensive current diplomatic initiatives of the Western States in the Middle East and North Africa.

addition to the various political and military position supports the U.S. are looking at even high ranking officials from Europe, the region, including such well-known faces like David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, the French Prime Minister Francois Fillon, his English Prime Minister Jose Louis Rodriguez Zapatero, Catherine Ashton, EU foreign policy representative, and Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO Secretary General. The U.S. and its European allies pursue several objectives to this meeting. First, you want to prevent that occurring fundamental changes in the governmental systems of the region. The overthrow of the dictators in the Middle East hah political equations in the Middle East changed. The Westerners have prior to the submission of their supposedly democratic strategies and secret and open interference in the crisis countries to present the developments in the region as a movement, which emerged from the western democracy. Under this policy, they try a hand by manipulating the slogans and demands of the people to prevent their uprising in the path of Islamic and patriotic demands moves.

try Western governments, there to pass off as a threat, that the advocates of Islam in the Arab countries of the region come to power.

Another important objective of the Western States in the Middle East region is to establish contacts with the leaders of the opposition groups and establish the toppled regime or in the fall term violence to divide between them. The West wants to distract the people's movement in this way by their justice and freedom-seeking goals and take advantage of the situation created to bring Western impaired secularists to power. Western governments have, however, forget that the Islamic awakening is one of the important features of the recent protests. The uprising is clear from the self-knowledge and undulates through the entire region of the Middle East. These uprisings were, although the U.S. and its European allies over the past 3 decades after the victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran wanted to spread the Islam phobia in the region and with the secular and oppressive Arab states built the front of the concession stand with the Zionist regime against the Islamic revolution. Now breaks this front of the concession stand with Tel Aviv from the inside out. Meanwhile, the opposite front of the Islamic resistance has been strengthened. Western governments and media, despite their violent propaganda to distort the truth of the recent uprisings in the Middle East is not close our eyes to the future prospects of Islamic protest.

you can not Leugern that the people during their protest rallies the community prayers. These people strongly demand the revival of Islamic identity, both of themselves and their country. Perhaps the Western governments to stop the great wave of popular uprisings in the Middle East shortly, but they can not curb this great movement. These uprisings going back not only to economic problems, but arose because the Islamic world have recognized the hypocritical nature of western governments and their lies regarding the defense of freedom and democracy and not fall more on the fabrications of the United States and its European allies.

Hosni Mubarak, Muammar Gaddafi, Ali Abdullah Salih and another to sway guessed despots in the Middle East spread, are now defenders of democracy and freedom of nations has become! Western governments want to do with their criticism of the violent regimes just as if they are on the side of the popular uprisings in the Middle East countries.

same time they try namely the revolutionary movement of populations against the dictatorships in itself to take advantage and seize. The U.S. and some European countries do, namely, that people come to power, their illegitimate interests of justice in the Middle East. try at the level of the media and the diplomatic level Western government, popular uprisings against those dictatorships that they themselves have previously supported direct, so to ensure that their interests met. On media level, the aim is to present the popular movements in the Middle East countries only as a protest against poverty and against the corruption of the rulers. But the protest surveys in the Middle East and North Africa go far beyond that. The condemnation of poverty and the financial corruption of the governments are only two dimensions of these protests. For example, included the rejection of imperialism on the characteristics of these uprisings. The oppressive, undemocratic systems in the Middle East and North Africa are characterized by their dependence on the West, exactly the West, who claims it to be for freedom and democracy!

Western governments try in the media world and their diplomacy to achieve that the dependence of the dictatorships of them face down in the Middle East region remains. This behavior of U.S. and European governments to the population in countries with dictatorships and their support for these dictators is an old story.

Comparing the opinions of the U.S. and Europe against the protest movement of the Iranian, Indonesian, Egyptian and Tunisian and Libyan Revolution in the last 3 decades, is emerging is a consistent behavioral model. Western governments support as long as it is at all, the survival of dictatorships. They hold back with any means of political and economic and security issues and access dictators under the arms. To allow these thousands of people behind bars or reflected bloody demonstrations.

But if the protests are not more people get a handle on changing the policy of the West rapidly.

Then they put the criticism of members and supporters of the previous regime on the agenda. In Iran, Indonesia, Tunisia and Egypt, we are confronted with this approach. Dictators like the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Mohammad Suharto, Zeynul Abedin Bin Ali Husni Mobarak and finally in the crisis lost their clear backing from the West. As the deposed Shah of Iran puts it, they have people like him thrown out like rats from their countries. Western governments to grant the deposed dictators do not even asylum. They do not confront the angry masses. The deposed Shah of Iran had to after his escape from Iran two years to stay in different countries, until he died alone in Egypt. Zeyn ul-Abedin Bin Ali did after his flight from Tunisia seek refuge in France, but his biggest supporter of former Sarkozy, had not let the plane landed with him on board in his country. The Tunisian dictator had to look at the Saudis on the Arabian Peninsula Refuge. Hosni Mubarak also received a letter of invitation from Western countries. His property was confiscated and was leaving the territory.

short, the Western countries after the end of this phase, started the popular uprisings under the cloak: to direct "defense of democracy" in a way that the new systems also guarantee their interests.

Currently, the U.S. is on the west block in leading the popular uprising in the region against the dictatorships astray. These states are trying, through coordination with each other as much as possible, diplomatic measures in the region and internationally to take the level to manage the popular uprisings in the region. This explains the extensive current diplomatic initiatives of the western states in the Middle East and North Africa.

addition to the various political and military position supports the U.S. are looking at even high ranking officials from Europe, the region, including such well-known faces like David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, the French Prime Minister Francois Fillon, his English Prime Minister Jose Louis Rodriguez Zapatero, Catherine Ashton, EU foreign policy representative, and Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the NATO Secretary General. The U.S. and its European allies pursue several objectives to this meeting. First, you want to prevent that occurring fundamental changes in the governmental systems of the region. The overthrow of the dictators in the Middle East hah changed the political equations in the Middle East. The Westerners have prior to the submission of their supposedly democratic strategies and secret and open interference in the crisis countries to present the developments in the region as a movement, which emerged from the western democracy. Under this policy, they try a hand by manipulating the slogans and demands of the people to prevent their uprising in the path of Islamic and patriotic demands moves.

try Western governments, there to pass off as a threat, that the advocates of Islam in the Arab countries of the region come to power.

Another important goal of Western nations in the Middle East region is to establish contacts with the leaders of the opposition groups and establish the toppled regime or in the fall term violence to divide between them. The West wants to distract the people's movement in this way by their justice and freedom-seeking goals and take advantage of the situation created to bring Western impaired secularists to power. Western governments have, however, forget that the Islamic awakening is one of the important features of the recent protests. The uprising is clear from the self-knowledge and surges by the whole region of the Middle East. These uprisings were, although the U.S. and its European allies over the past 3 decades after the victory of Islamic Revolution in Iran, the Islamic phobia wanted to spread in the region and with the secular and oppressive Arab states, the front of the concession stand with the Zionist regime against the Islamic Revolution setups. Now breaks this front of the concession stand with Tel Aviv from the inside out. Meanwhile, the opposite front of the Islamic resistance has been strengthened. Western governments and media can not, despite their violent propaganda to distort the truth of the recent uprisings in the Middle East blind eye to the future prospects of Islamic protest surveys close.

You can not Leugern that people do during their protests, the community prayer. These people strongly demand the revival of Islamic identity, both of themselves and their country. Perhaps the Western governments to stop the great wave of popular uprisings in the Middle East shortly, but they can not curb this great movement. These uprisings going back not only to economic problems, but arose because the Islamic world, the hypocritical nature of western governments and their lies regarding the defense of freedom and have realized democracy and not fall more on the fabrications of the United States and its European allies. be
No country on earth has by U.S. troops "liberated" - on the contrary, it must be liberated by U.S. troops!